alexpgp: (Default)
alexpgp ([personal profile] alexpgp) wrote2001-04-20 10:35 am

Close call...

I don't know what gets into me, sometimes.

This morning, I decided to see what the Linux for Windows package had under the hood, so after reading the installation instructions carefully, I set about installing it on my Sony laptop.

Big mistake.

The install got to the point where it had to create a "loopback" file, and failed. The install routine calmly went back to its last checkpoint, namely, asking me where I wanted to install the program.

Well, the program wouldn't install, so...how do I exit the installation program?

Ctrl-Alt-Del doesn't work. Ctrl-C doesn't work, nor does Ctrl-Z.

Okay, hit the BRS (which is neither big, nor red on my Sony), and the machine is off. Wait a few seconds. Turn the machine back on.

Yikes! I'm back in the install program.

What gives? Just where is this program living?

Turn the machine off again. Think for a while.

Turn it back on.

The program is still active.

Try clicking on various parts of the screen. No joy.

Do the off/on thing again. Same result.

Ye gods. The RPE comes by and tells me he's got work for me.

Whoopee. I'm sitting here with a crippled laptop where all of my dictionaries are stored, useless to me at the moment.

Try one more thing...turn the machine on...then off before anything happens...then on again.

Did I mention I have my fingers crossed as I do this?

I see the Sony logo flash on the screen, which tells me I've exorcised the install program.

I see the BSOD. All things considered, I don't feel so bad; I've been here before.

Reboot into safe mode, where the machine checks the C: drive. Restart.

I'm back in Windows...and a little wiser for the experience, and feeling lucky.

Cheers...

[identity profile] alexpgp.livejournal.com 2001-04-20 05:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Personally, I just think it's Windows tired of doing the same old thing <grin>.

If it is something deliberate on Windows part, it certainly is more subtle than what happened soon after the release of OS/2 v. 2 by IBM back in...'92. At the time, OS/2 would run DOS, Windows, and native OS/2 apps. Scant weeks after the release, MS revved 3.1 to 3.11. This added peer-to-peer networking...and any apps written for 3.11 would, um, no longer run under OS/2.

Ah, the good old days, when things were so straightforward.

I'm just wondering if it's not something associated with it being a laptop I'm installing onto. Linux has a reputation for being particularly picky about the hardware it runs on, especially laptops.

Cheers...