2005-07-28

alexpgp: (Barcode)
2005-07-28 11:31 am

Another candidate...

...for Goofy and Unintuitive Design (GUD).

My cell phone is a Samsung a610. Among other features, it has the capability of storing up to 5 numbers (labeled "Home," "Office," "Mobile," "Pager," and "Fax") and 2 email addresses for each of up to 500 entries.

There is one, little catch, though.

None of the phone numbers can be the same.

This means that if I want to store the work numbers for Alice and Bob and they happen to work at the same company (i.e., they have the same work phone number)... it can't be done. (What possessed Samsung's designers to assume none of the people I deal with would work for the same company?)

It would appear the simplest solution would be to create a third, separate entry for their employer.

And if Bob and Carol share the same personal roof (and therefore, the same home phone number), I may as well keep both "Home" slots of them blank, since only one can contain their home number. (What possessed Samsung's designers to assume none of the people I want to call will share a common home number?)

Here, too, the simplest solution is to create a common entry for them both.

So instead of having three entries - for Alice, Bob, and Carol - where all I have to do is find their name and then select the number to call, I'll have three different entries - one for Alice, one joint entry for Bob and Carol, and one entry for Alice and Bob's employer - where all I have to do is remember that:

1. Alice's work number is stored under the name of her employer
2. Ditto for Bob
3. Bob's home number is stored in the joint entry for Bob and Carol
4. Carol's home number is also stored in the joint entry for Bob and Carol.

In each case, I'll have to remember who I want to call, and then remember where the number can be found.

I just ran across this "feature" when I tried to add an entry for "ICE" (which stands for "In Case of Emergency"), which would call my wife if I were to be injured in an accident to the extent where I could not tell anyone whom to call. (BTW, for more information about the ICE initiative, check out this post at the Moleskinerie. Hat tip: OpenLoops)

GUD going, Samsung!

Cheers...

P.S. It turns out that if you add a two-second pause to the end of a phone number, you can store the same phone number in two entries (one simply has an extra character at the end for the pause). This will work for one or two ICE entries, but doesn't really address the general issue of what to do if, say, all your friends work at the same company.
alexpgp: (Default)
2005-07-28 01:27 pm

An 'airy' frame of mind... (not!)

I'm sitting here trying to figure out what the best way is of getting from Here to There, and keep butting up against this irrational - okay, maybe not so irrational -- fear of encountering a delay somewhere that completely eliminates any chance of recovery by, say, taking a later flight.

The itinerary I've flown the past two times is not available, according to Travelocity (which is why I have a call in to a travel agent). A second itinerary involves four landings until I get to Moscow, one of which has only a 90 minute layover (not to mention that the whole process takes 21 hours). The price is good, but in addition to the 90 minute layover at Heathrow, the itinerary only gives me a 2.5 hour layover after the Mesa flight from Durango, which based on my previous two outings, is cutting it a little too close, time-wise. (Recall that both times, the plane for my outbound flight from Durango arrived at the airport after the flight was scheduled to actually leave.)

I've given some thought to flying from Durango to New York, and then buying a separate ticket from New York to Moscow and back. This would have the added advantage of allowing me to visit my parents, at least on the way back from Kazakhstan, and is not all that much more expensive. The downside is either having to shell out bucks for a hotel in New York (which will not be reimbursed), or arrive at 5:30 am from Phoenix and sit around the airport waiting for a 4:15 pm flight. The other downside is that this only works if the departure date holds, which is not a done deal by any measure, so actually... this alternative goes bye-bye.

Flying from Albuquerque would be very convenient, except for the price and the little question of getting to and from Albuquerque... twice.

I think my travel agent should be back from lunch by now. I will give him a call and let him worry about it.

(I am also not tremendously happy about being in permanent curmudgeon mode, lately. I need to lighten up, or at least think pleasant thoughts.)

Cheers...