Noodlin' around LJ...
Aug. 16th, 2000 07:55 pmSoon after joining this community, I noticed just how much I disliked small print running all the way across a wide screen, so I started to format my posts (more or less) with carriage returns. While the net effect looks okay (if a bit uneven) on high-res monitors, I found out the hard way (using lynx) that if the browser's going to be formatting your stuff, it's best to embed something into the HTML that'll help do the job.
So, I went into the modification area (see the FAQ) and added a particular width to the table cells that hold the text of posts such as these. Maybe I'll go back someday and change the pixel value to a percentage, who knows? The point is, if I do so, the HTML that's fed to my browser will take care of the format.
One caveat, though: I had been using the ` ' construction to indent lines by main force, and I abandonded that in favor of small tables with the following syntax:
<TABLE BORDER="0" CELLPADDING="5"><TR><TD>
[content here]
</TD></TR></TABLE>
It turns out that, if this code contains a typo, the page it appears on will likely not load.
I went through this just now, and for a wild moment, I thought that, perhaps, I'd successfully flushed a bunch of postings into the well-known bit-bucket, but a glance at the source of what did arrive showed that I'd typed `,/TABLE>' at the end of the table, instead of `</TABLE>'.
So, I went into the modification area (see the FAQ) and added a particular width to the table cells that hold the text of posts such as these. Maybe I'll go back someday and change the pixel value to a percentage, who knows? The point is, if I do so, the HTML that's fed to my browser will take care of the format.
One caveat, though: I had been using the ` ' construction to indent lines by main force, and I abandonded that in favor of small tables with the following syntax:
<TABLE BORDER="0" CELLPADDING="5"><TR><TD>
[content here]
</TD></TR></TABLE>
It turns out that, if this code contains a typo, the page it appears on will likely not load.
I went through this just now, and for a wild moment, I thought that, perhaps, I'd successfully flushed a bunch of postings into the well-known bit-bucket, but a glance at the source of what did arrive showed that I'd typed `,/TABLE>' at the end of the table, instead of `</TABLE>'.