
Fellow LJer
vebelfetzer created this striking piece of artwork in the wake of 9-11. In a subsequent post to her LJ, on October 10, she responded at length to someone who had commented on one of her posts. I've mentioned, in a previous post, that when I read her well-reasoned and lucidly written response, I was prompted to add her to my friends list.
But something in her response has been bugging me. I went to take another look at it, and here's the paragraph that's been bothering me:
But we didn't start it. And nobody, not even the bloated corporate monster that many of these people seem to think America is, deserves what happened. And yes, this -is- like a mother protecting her children. American civilians are, by and large, helpless, in a military sense. This was proven by how easily the terrorists were able to wrest control of the planes in the first place. Our government's job is to work for us in a similar way as parents "work" for their children. Providing for us, while also trying to "raise" us and allow us to make our own decisions. And we do expect the government to protect us. With the military, with laws, with court systems. [Emphasis mine.]
I profoundly disagree with the sentences I've italicized. Government is supposed to "work" for us by protecting our rights (as noted in the last two sentences of the excerpt), not by acting
in loco parentis. Further, while government has adopted a posture as a "provider" to its citizens, we must keep in mind that if we are speaking of the material realm, the government has nothing to offer other than what has already been provided to it by the citizenry (minus a cut to pay for the cost of collecting and then dispensing the funds).
As for the rest of this excerpt (and her post in general) she is right smack on, in my opinion. The American people have in many ways become essentially helpless, often at the urging - both direct and indirect - of their government. Given the inertia of the past few decades, where both government and media readily (and repeatedly) voice the need for the government to "do something" in the face of some real or imagined difficulty, it's not surprising that people now passively sit back and expect government to solve all their problems... and quickly.
My interpretation of the drawing does not view the government playing the role of parent, teacher, or provider. The woman in the picture is not the government; she is Liberty. In my opinion, Liberty - the spirit of freedom -
is very much our parent, in the spiritual sense, where "our" refers to the
unum in
e pluribus unum (out of many, one). And it will be Liberty that will inspire us to meet this new challenge.
Cheers...