Can you say 'ad hominem'?
Aug. 7th, 2007 01:35 pmThere used to be a time, or maybe not, when science was decided by facts. But in an age where science is faced with empirical evidence of climate change that requires computer simulation to interpret, things are not so clear cut.
Recently, I've noted a disturbing trend in the global warming "debate." I use scare quotes around "debate" because only folks who question the conclusion that global warming is caused by humans seem to want to discuss the issue. Intellectual giants such as Al Gore and his ilk don't need no stinkin' debate, of course, because the scientific consensus - even among people who don't actually work in the field of climate science - is that global warming is caused by humans and can be controlled by humans, if only the right people are given the means to enforce their will on the rest of us.
I mean, that's what governments are for, right?
So recently, those who doubt the certainty of human-caused global warming have been described as "deniers," an emotionally charged word that has, up to now, been used to describe those who, over the past almost two generations, have maintained that the death tolls in Nazi concentration camps - especially that "6 million" number that describes the number of Jews killed - is an elaborately crafted lie.
Just now, I read a story on Wired in which doubters of the causes and effects of global warming are accused of manipulating data and are basically likened to the wags hired by the tobacco industry decades ago to discredit data on the apparent link between smoking and lung cancer.
Presumably, anyone who doubts the party line must do so at their own personal expense, in their free time, just to even things up with pro-party-line bureaucrats and scientists, who, in their entire careers, have been provided with, literally, billions of dollars in staff, salaries, and budgets to promote an outcome that would aggrandize said careers, staffs, salaries, and budgets and boost the agendas of parties who seek to aggrandize political power and who, if they worked for Monsanto or Halliburton and had the effrontery to make the kind of claims they are making, would be shipped off to the loony bin as delusional.
I wonder what's next? I wouldn't be surprised if people like Gore start accusing their opponents of being Nazis.
Cheers...
Recently, I've noted a disturbing trend in the global warming "debate." I use scare quotes around "debate" because only folks who question the conclusion that global warming is caused by humans seem to want to discuss the issue. Intellectual giants such as Al Gore and his ilk don't need no stinkin' debate, of course, because the scientific consensus - even among people who don't actually work in the field of climate science - is that global warming is caused by humans and can be controlled by humans, if only the right people are given the means to enforce their will on the rest of us.
I mean, that's what governments are for, right?
So recently, those who doubt the certainty of human-caused global warming have been described as "deniers," an emotionally charged word that has, up to now, been used to describe those who, over the past almost two generations, have maintained that the death tolls in Nazi concentration camps - especially that "6 million" number that describes the number of Jews killed - is an elaborately crafted lie.
Just now, I read a story on Wired in which doubters of the causes and effects of global warming are accused of manipulating data and are basically likened to the wags hired by the tobacco industry decades ago to discredit data on the apparent link between smoking and lung cancer.
Presumably, anyone who doubts the party line must do so at their own personal expense, in their free time, just to even things up with pro-party-line bureaucrats and scientists, who, in their entire careers, have been provided with, literally, billions of dollars in staff, salaries, and budgets to promote an outcome that would aggrandize said careers, staffs, salaries, and budgets and boost the agendas of parties who seek to aggrandize political power and who, if they worked for Monsanto or Halliburton and had the effrontery to make the kind of claims they are making, would be shipped off to the loony bin as delusional.
I wonder what's next? I wouldn't be surprised if people like Gore start accusing their opponents of being Nazis.
Cheers...