Bye, bye U3...
Dec. 20th, 2007 10:04 amWhen it was introduced, U3 seemed an interesting technology that would allow you to install specially tweaked applications onto a USB flash drive, in such a way that any configuration data that might normally end up residing on the computer's hard drive would instead be stored on the USB device. The result would be a flash drive you could insert into any computer and (a) not have to wonder if your preferred applications were installed on the machine, and (b) not have to wonder if your work left any data on the machine.
After playing around with the technology for a while, I was underwhelmed. First, there are a number of "portable" apps being developed out there that do not require U3. Second, some publishers, sensing some kind of premium value in the air, actually charge more for U3-enabled apps than for their normal ones. Finally, it turns out that, like most "portable solutions," it really isn't unless the folks that own the machine you want to use it on agree that it is.
Thus, a lot of people wonder: Why not just wipe it off my flash drive?
Conventional methods do not work, because the technology is designed to regenerate itself even if the USB device is wiped, presumably accidentally. Eventually, the U3 consortium did come up with a program that will zap U3 "permanently" (meaning there's a way to try get it back, which works most of the time), and SanDisk came up with its own, separate program to do the same thing on units it manufactures.
Since I have a SanDisk U3 drive, I downloaded and attempted to use their software to kill the U3 on my flash disk. The software does not work. Google suggested the consortium's software would do the trick just as well. It did.
Recovering the 4 MB or so (out of a gig) is not the point. Not having useless software run on my computer is.
* * * Natalie called a little while ago to tell me Galina is on the road, passing Lafayette, Louisiana. She's convinced one of the people who's been helping us in Texas to come along on the trip, so I'm pegging an ETA of mid-day tomorrow.
This means I need to get cracking on translation, at least. I managed to decline a weekend job yesterday. I've accepted a 300-word warmup for this morning, and two hazard reports for next Thursday.
Cheers...
After playing around with the technology for a while, I was underwhelmed. First, there are a number of "portable" apps being developed out there that do not require U3. Second, some publishers, sensing some kind of premium value in the air, actually charge more for U3-enabled apps than for their normal ones. Finally, it turns out that, like most "portable solutions," it really isn't unless the folks that own the machine you want to use it on agree that it is.
Thus, a lot of people wonder: Why not just wipe it off my flash drive?
Conventional methods do not work, because the technology is designed to regenerate itself even if the USB device is wiped, presumably accidentally. Eventually, the U3 consortium did come up with a program that will zap U3 "permanently" (meaning there's a way to try get it back, which works most of the time), and SanDisk came up with its own, separate program to do the same thing on units it manufactures.
Since I have a SanDisk U3 drive, I downloaded and attempted to use their software to kill the U3 on my flash disk. The software does not work. Google suggested the consortium's software would do the trick just as well. It did.
Recovering the 4 MB or so (out of a gig) is not the point. Not having useless software run on my computer is.
This means I need to get cracking on translation, at least. I managed to decline a weekend job yesterday. I've accepted a 300-word warmup for this morning, and two hazard reports for next Thursday.
Cheers...