Wiki warmth...
Feb. 15th, 2006 09:56 pmI notice that a lot of sites now have a wiki adjunct, which is far superior (in my arrogant opinion) to those same-old-same-old threaded discussion groups you can find on 16-inch centers just about anywhere. If you've followed my key-tappings, you know I'm a fan of wikis.
I've been fortunate enough to be able to set up wikis on various sites, here and there. My first attempt was with something called TWiki, which was a little like starting swimming lessons by marching off to the deep end of the pool, tying a heavy weight around your waist, and jumping in. TWiki has a heck of a lot of features, but just too many for the "average" candidate to have to worry about, including me.
I then experimented with WackoWiki and MediaWiki. The former has an unfortunate name; the result, I suppose, of having been developed by folks in Russia (and who therefore were not guided by any marketing considerations). On the plus side, however, WackoWiki had a very well developed access control mechanism in place, which is why I use it for my work web site, so I can have individual pages that only I and my various clients can access.
As far as MediaWiki is concerned, I really, really wanted to like it, but when the comment spammers started to post their offal faster than I could delete it, I was put in the unfortunate position of having to either surrender to their automated sewage, or to make the site one for users-only. And since I was the only user, well...
Have I mentioned how hard it is to get people to buy into the wiki concept?
It is not easy, but that's grist for another post.
Anyway, the other day, I was surfing the Usual Web Sites™ and ran across a site that creates wikis on demand for anyone who happens by, PBwiki.com. Just to ornery, I hit the registration button, and with less fuss than you'd expect when applying for a throwaway email address, these guys had set up a wiki for me, which currently goes by the (semi-)ambiguous name of Pagosa.
I really would like to get some of the computer-savvy folks around here - here being Pagosa Springs and particularly the hams - involved in wikis.
In this wiki.
I think my approach to date - which has been to try to create a kernel of content that will "inspire" others to build on it - is just not the way to go about building a viable wiki. If there's any inspiring to be done, I need to get people to create their own content that will spur them to a kind of self-sustaining inertia.
As I said, grist for another post.
In any event, as opposed to some wikis I've seen, the default offered by the folks at pbwiki.com is a nice starting point, and it sure is convenient not to have to worry about the really basic stuff.
Cheers...
I've been fortunate enough to be able to set up wikis on various sites, here and there. My first attempt was with something called TWiki, which was a little like starting swimming lessons by marching off to the deep end of the pool, tying a heavy weight around your waist, and jumping in. TWiki has a heck of a lot of features, but just too many for the "average" candidate to have to worry about, including me.
I then experimented with WackoWiki and MediaWiki. The former has an unfortunate name; the result, I suppose, of having been developed by folks in Russia (and who therefore were not guided by any marketing considerations). On the plus side, however, WackoWiki had a very well developed access control mechanism in place, which is why I use it for my work web site, so I can have individual pages that only I and my various clients can access.
As far as MediaWiki is concerned, I really, really wanted to like it, but when the comment spammers started to post their offal faster than I could delete it, I was put in the unfortunate position of having to either surrender to their automated sewage, or to make the site one for users-only. And since I was the only user, well...
Have I mentioned how hard it is to get people to buy into the wiki concept?
It is not easy, but that's grist for another post.
Anyway, the other day, I was surfing the Usual Web Sites™ and ran across a site that creates wikis on demand for anyone who happens by, PBwiki.com. Just to ornery, I hit the registration button, and with less fuss than you'd expect when applying for a throwaway email address, these guys had set up a wiki for me, which currently goes by the (semi-)ambiguous name of Pagosa.
I really would like to get some of the computer-savvy folks around here - here being Pagosa Springs and particularly the hams - involved in wikis.
In this wiki.
I think my approach to date - which has been to try to create a kernel of content that will "inspire" others to build on it - is just not the way to go about building a viable wiki. If there's any inspiring to be done, I need to get people to create their own content that will spur them to a kind of self-sustaining inertia.
As I said, grist for another post.
In any event, as opposed to some wikis I've seen, the default offered by the folks at pbwiki.com is a nice starting point, and it sure is convenient not to have to worry about the really basic stuff.
Cheers...
no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 05:21 am (UTC)