The Big Grab...
Jun. 9th, 2001 11:04 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
alexpgp"The newest version of Microsoft's Internet Explorer Web browser will be able to direct Web page readers to other sites without the permission - or even the knowledge - of the page's owner." (lead sentence from an article on USATODAY.com).
It would appear that Microsoft is going for it all. In addition to a browser scheme that will embed links where the page designer had none, Microsoft has plans as far as operating systems are concerned. And since eventually the only products you can buy from Microsoft are the ones in current release, it would seem that these schemes will become the norm within 5 years or so.
The new XP operating system, for example, seems designed for one thing, and that's to reinstate copy protection on the world, automatically, and with a vengeance. Products such as Office will be able to be run only a limited number of times (or for a limited amount of time) before you'll have to "call home" either over the Internet or by phone, to get an activation code that's matched to your system.
In a recent newsletter, Scot Finnie told of reviewing XP, and he was not happy with it. After encountering problems with his review copy (the Product ID was bad), Finnie writes, "I learned that I would have to uninstall Office XP entirely and then reinstall it in order to use the new Product ID Microsoft sent me. I found myself immediately exasperated that Microsoft hadn't figured out a better way to change a Product ID number. What happened to how easy production activation was supposed to be for us all?"
Also suspect are the prices for various programs and upgrades, which appear to be pretty impressive. If this scheme is going to eliminate piracy, which in turn would curtail the "billions" in losses that companies such as Microsoft claim they incur due to pirates, how come none of those savings are being passed on to "loyal" customers?
The issue is, I guess, whether corporate customers are going to roll over (or perhaps the more apt expression would be "bend over") and quietly accept XP, or whether the new "features" of the system will serve as the straw that will break the back of Microsoft, as users seek less, um, coercive alternatives.
Cheers...
It would appear that Microsoft is going for it all. In addition to a browser scheme that will embed links where the page designer had none, Microsoft has plans as far as operating systems are concerned. And since eventually the only products you can buy from Microsoft are the ones in current release, it would seem that these schemes will become the norm within 5 years or so.
The new XP operating system, for example, seems designed for one thing, and that's to reinstate copy protection on the world, automatically, and with a vengeance. Products such as Office will be able to be run only a limited number of times (or for a limited amount of time) before you'll have to "call home" either over the Internet or by phone, to get an activation code that's matched to your system.
In a recent newsletter, Scot Finnie told of reviewing XP, and he was not happy with it. After encountering problems with his review copy (the Product ID was bad), Finnie writes, "I learned that I would have to uninstall Office XP entirely and then reinstall it in order to use the new Product ID Microsoft sent me. I found myself immediately exasperated that Microsoft hadn't figured out a better way to change a Product ID number. What happened to how easy production activation was supposed to be for us all?"
Also suspect are the prices for various programs and upgrades, which appear to be pretty impressive. If this scheme is going to eliminate piracy, which in turn would curtail the "billions" in losses that companies such as Microsoft claim they incur due to pirates, how come none of those savings are being passed on to "loyal" customers?
The issue is, I guess, whether corporate customers are going to roll over (or perhaps the more apt expression would be "bend over") and quietly accept XP, or whether the new "features" of the system will serve as the straw that will break the back of Microsoft, as users seek less, um, coercive alternatives.
Cheers...
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
basically, the ability to forge headers, source packets, i.e. items related to dos attacks will be available in a consumer level os. add to this the increasing(?) availability of broadband in the home, the overall cluelessness of computer users in terms of security (or lack thereof), and you have the receipe for an unholy mess...
no subject
Date: 2001-06-10 02:38 pm (UTC)*the foregoing should not in any way be interpreted as support of Micro$oft or any of their customer-friendly policies ;)*
no subject
Date: 2001-06-10 05:02 pm (UTC)i'd would like to amaze everyone now with a brilliant and witty analogy on the whole thing but since i know tomorrow is monday...blagh and all that comes to mind is some base thing belong something or other to somebody...? weak i know but i really don't like mondays and can't find a decent burrito.
no subject
Exploitation of such a feature might be just the thing that would raise a public outcry demanding the government to step in and regulate the Internet.
Technical arguments from the loony (read: non-Microsoft) fringe could be calmly ignored or drowned in the hysterical outcry for Someone to "do something."
Microsoft could then step forward to complete the loop, offering its considerable technical expertise to build a "safe" Internet that would serve homes and businesses, while preserving the legitimate interests of government and law-enforcement agencies in tracking what's going on.
<paranoia value="off">
Cheers...