alexpgp: (Interpreter's life)
[personal profile] alexpgp
Last Friday, the morning after Michael Jackson died, I happened to be in the kitchen pouring myself a cup of coffee when I overheard Matt Lauer segue into a segment featuring the godfather to Jackson's children, who apparently had something newsworthy to say. After having observed the widespread pre-emption of quite a bit of programming the night before to cover Jackson's death, I perceived Lauer's report as a signal that, barring some kind of surprising or scandalous revelation, the subject of Michael Jackson's death had been pretty much exhausted over the airwaves.

My bad.

This morning, very nearly a week after Jackson's death, I was again in the kitchen, again pouring coffee, and there was good old Matt Lauer, giving viewers a tour of the house at Neverland Ranch.

Somewhere in the past couple of days, I heard a snippet, to the effect that a Pew Research Center poll found that 64 percent of people surveyed thought coverage of Jackson's death was excessive. I was not surprised at the result of the survey.

What did surprise me today was hearing about how MSNBC's Nancy Snyderman took the opportunity to dig into the poll to focus on the racial aspects of the results. Presumably, it was really important to come up with a reason why 70% of whites felt coverage was excessive, as opposed to just 38% of African-Americans who felt that way.

Ye gods.

Personally, I think the major networks are milking the Jackson tragedy for all that it's worth, and I would imagine it's worth a lot, because if all that coverage didn't bring in the big bucks, then they'd be doing something else. Personally, I prefer to exercise my natural right to largely ignore the boob tube, which probably makes me a misanthrope of some kind.

Anyway, as far as the networks are concerned, who wants to listen to all that boring stuff about Congress voting on bills that nobody has read (Waxman-Markey), Potemkin-style "town hall" meetings (via Chip Reid and Helen Thomas, of all people), or unemployment hitting a 26-year high?

Cheers...

Date: 2009-07-03 02:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] furzicle.livejournal.com
Ah, the misanthrope club. If not watching TV puts you there, then I am definitely a member. The only drawback that I can see is that it makes it a little hard to socialize with some people. But who would want to socialize with people who talk about TV?

Date: 2009-07-03 02:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alexpgp.livejournal.com
It depends how you talk about it, I guess.

For example, it occurs to me that Snyderman's analysis offers an excellent opportunity to do a little algebraic problem-solving, to wit:
Given:
  1. 64% of all persons polled felt coverage was excessive
  2. 70% of "whites" polled felt coverage was excessive
  3. 38% of "African-Americans" polled felt coverage was excessive
What percentage of the polled group was "Aftrican-American"?

(Extra credit: What assumption do you have to make to solve this problem?)
But that's just me.

Cheers...
Edited Date: 2009-07-03 02:55 pm (UTC)

Date: 2009-07-03 05:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hyrkanian.livejournal.com
Me too. I heard about MJ's death on NPR the morning of, since that's what our alarm clock is set to. Except for stuff mentioned in LiveJournal, not heard a peep about it since. And happy to be that way. Our one tv is used for Wii Fit and Wii Active, and we long ago cancelled cable/satellite tv.

I was a fan of MJ in middle school and the band played several of his songs. But not so much after I grew up.

Profile

alexpgp: (Default)
alexpgp

January 2018

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3456
7 8910111213
14 15 16 17181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 23rd, 2025 12:39 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios