Fridaying...
Dec. 26th, 2003 05:53 pmI didn't get a good night's sleep at all, and got up too late to go to the ham breakfast (assuming, of course, that there was such an animal, as it tends to disappear around the holidays, but I digress...).
An interesting article on the front page of The Wall Street Journal quotes the developer of the MRI as saying that the history of science of the past 50 years could be written using papers that were rejected as "bad science" over that period. The article in which the remark was made has to do with one researcher's hypothesis as to the role played by zinc and copper in Alzheimer's Disease, and how for the longest time he could not get the science establishment to so much as give him the time of day, research-wise.
That is one of the reasons I shudder at the centralization of research funding at the hands of government. It'd be bad enough to have a few private corporations control who gets what money for research, but when such decisions are placed in the hands of government, I believe the results tend to be much worse, as the decision-making becomes more centralized and more dependent on results that increase the scope of government and consequently, less dependent on whether the results of that research have any utility in real life.
Areas that are thus affected include a lot of medical research, the issue of global warming, as well as space exploration.
The talking bimbette on the morning news today did an ineptly transparent job of attempting to foment fear, uncertainty, and doubt regarding "mad cow" disease; hell, the poor dear was nearly beside herself with hysteria as she tried, unsuccessfully, to steer her interviewee (someone from one of the Colorado universities) to the inescapable conclusion that The End Is (probably) At Hand.
In doing some background reading about PayPal and how successful I might be in invoking an American Express chargeback in case I don't see my eBay merchandise soon, I happened to run across a piece in which it was reported that PayPal had violated the Patriot Act last year by allowing its services to be used for the payment of gambling debts. Now, to be sure, the transfer of funds to cover bogus gambling debts could probably be a heck of a revenue source if you're a terrorist in search of lucre (it's also been used as a device in detective literature, if memory serves, although I can't recall any specific stories in this regard). But it seems to me that this is simply another instance of using a bill ostensibly passed as a counter-terrorism measure to achieve traditional crime-fighting goals by other means (the other instance I'm aware of is the prosecution of drug dealers as terrorists under the Act).
And as far as the eBay situtation is concerned, I asked for and received the contact information for the seller, which turned out to be spectacularly unhelpful. When I called in the morning, a child answered the phone and a very strange conversation ensued. When I called a couple of hours ago, an answering machine took the call. My PayPal research indicates that they (PayPal) really don't like customers to do chargebacks (when you complain to a credit card company, which then withholds payment from the other party). Instead, they prefer you pursue reimbusement through them (albeit at a $25 charge, which, for a $35 item, hardly seems worth the effort, although I digress...).
I can't help but note however, that the seller has a 100% approval rating on eBay, and that the last three or four buyers left feedback almost a month after their deals ended. So, maybe I'm just impatient, I don't know... (I don't think so, but maybe I should be more patient.)
Gotta go cook something for Galina.
Cheers...
An interesting article on the front page of The Wall Street Journal quotes the developer of the MRI as saying that the history of science of the past 50 years could be written using papers that were rejected as "bad science" over that period. The article in which the remark was made has to do with one researcher's hypothesis as to the role played by zinc and copper in Alzheimer's Disease, and how for the longest time he could not get the science establishment to so much as give him the time of day, research-wise.
That is one of the reasons I shudder at the centralization of research funding at the hands of government. It'd be bad enough to have a few private corporations control who gets what money for research, but when such decisions are placed in the hands of government, I believe the results tend to be much worse, as the decision-making becomes more centralized and more dependent on results that increase the scope of government and consequently, less dependent on whether the results of that research have any utility in real life.
Areas that are thus affected include a lot of medical research, the issue of global warming, as well as space exploration.
The talking bimbette on the morning news today did an ineptly transparent job of attempting to foment fear, uncertainty, and doubt regarding "mad cow" disease; hell, the poor dear was nearly beside herself with hysteria as she tried, unsuccessfully, to steer her interviewee (someone from one of the Colorado universities) to the inescapable conclusion that The End Is (probably) At Hand.
In doing some background reading about PayPal and how successful I might be in invoking an American Express chargeback in case I don't see my eBay merchandise soon, I happened to run across a piece in which it was reported that PayPal had violated the Patriot Act last year by allowing its services to be used for the payment of gambling debts. Now, to be sure, the transfer of funds to cover bogus gambling debts could probably be a heck of a revenue source if you're a terrorist in search of lucre (it's also been used as a device in detective literature, if memory serves, although I can't recall any specific stories in this regard). But it seems to me that this is simply another instance of using a bill ostensibly passed as a counter-terrorism measure to achieve traditional crime-fighting goals by other means (the other instance I'm aware of is the prosecution of drug dealers as terrorists under the Act).
And as far as the eBay situtation is concerned, I asked for and received the contact information for the seller, which turned out to be spectacularly unhelpful. When I called in the morning, a child answered the phone and a very strange conversation ensued. When I called a couple of hours ago, an answering machine took the call. My PayPal research indicates that they (PayPal) really don't like customers to do chargebacks (when you complain to a credit card company, which then withholds payment from the other party). Instead, they prefer you pursue reimbusement through them (albeit at a $25 charge, which, for a $35 item, hardly seems worth the effort, although I digress...).
I can't help but note however, that the seller has a 100% approval rating on eBay, and that the last three or four buyers left feedback almost a month after their deals ended. So, maybe I'm just impatient, I don't know... (I don't think so, but maybe I should be more patient.)
Gotta go cook something for Galina.
Cheers...