Correction...
Oct. 16th, 2015 04:11 pmI'm sorry, did I say "quark stars?"
I meant to say, "strange quark stars."
Ah, well...
I meant to say, "strange quark stars."
The objective of this work is to study the distribution of the magnetic field in a more realistic strange quark star, with a core consisting of atomic nuclei and degenerate electrons (Ae phase).This is not getting much easier.
Ah, well...
no subject
Date: 2015-10-16 10:02 pm (UTC)It should be nuclei+degenerate electrons --> neutrons --> quarks, going frome the outside in, not the other way round.
no subject
Date: 2015-10-17 12:31 am (UTC)Not "core," but "crust" (кора, which reflects what you said, I think).
Another one bites the dust!
UPDATE: Turns out I had it right the first couple of times the word appears in the text, then suffered an apparent brain fart and imagined it to be a pseudo-cognate.
Thanks again!
no subject
Date: 2015-10-17 12:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-10-17 12:37 am (UTC)You're welcome.
no subject
Date: 2015-10-17 02:55 am (UTC)Cheers...
no subject
Date: 2015-10-17 08:42 am (UTC)Isaac Asimov's popular science book about the life cycle of stars I've read years ago was so well-written that adding new knowledge to the model (such as quark stars) is both easy and interesting.