Apropos of International Women's Day...
Mar. 8th, 2005 11:22 amWhen I scrawled "Happy International Women's Day" on the white board in the store this morning, I was faced with the question: "Is it 'International Woman's Day' or 'International Women's Day'?" It's perhaps a minor point, but the kind of thing I can't leave alone, so despite my suspicions that the proper version was the former, I turned to Google, and searched for:
international woman's day
This turned up about 5.9 million results (and up there at the top of the list was a page with that title from the United Nations, apparently a typo, as we'll see below).
Now, most people, faced with almost 6 million results and a URL that points to the UN might decide, at that point, that they'd found the flow and that the best course would be to go with it. However, for better or worse, I'm not most people. On some kind of mad roll, I searched for
international women's day
This showed 5.6 million results (and - surprise! - again, up at the top of the list, was another page with that title from the UN).
I was momentarily confused at the fairly even distribution of results, until I realized I was searching for individual words. When I enclosed the phrase in quotes, the results were a lot more lopsided (and indicative):
"international women's day": 451,000
"international woman's day": 4,500
I would venture to guess that the even distribution when searching without quotes was caused by the common use of both singular and plural forms of "woman" on any page where either form appears.
Having done this exercise, Happy International Women's Day to all for whom the holiday was instituted!
Cheers...
international woman's day
This turned up about 5.9 million results (and up there at the top of the list was a page with that title from the United Nations, apparently a typo, as we'll see below).
Now, most people, faced with almost 6 million results and a URL that points to the UN might decide, at that point, that they'd found the flow and that the best course would be to go with it. However, for better or worse, I'm not most people. On some kind of mad roll, I searched for
international women's day
This showed 5.6 million results (and - surprise! - again, up at the top of the list, was another page with that title from the UN).
I was momentarily confused at the fairly even distribution of results, until I realized I was searching for individual words. When I enclosed the phrase in quotes, the results were a lot more lopsided (and indicative):
"international women's day": 451,000
"international woman's day": 4,500
I would venture to guess that the even distribution when searching without quotes was caused by the common use of both singular and plural forms of "woman" on any page where either form appears.
Having done this exercise, Happy International Women's Day to all for whom the holiday was instituted!
Cheers...